I have played backgammon about 45 years. For the first 20, I did not take the game very seriously... I mostly played with friends and family. I never entered a tournament or played for money.
Then one day, about 25 years ago, I walked into a restaurant in Chicago and there was a group of people gathered around a backgammon board all playing together. I found out later that it was called a "chouette " game, where several players competed for money, with one player on one side competing against all the rest on the other side.
I watched for a while, introduced myself, and was invited to play. The stakes weren't high, and it looked like fun, so I tried it. And then, probably the worst thing that could possibly happen, happened--I won! Not only did I win, but I won a lot; I got paid; and I had a lot of fun in the process. I was hooked.
I think that was the last time I won for a long time. Turns out that I won that first time simply because I was very lucky and often on the right side with the right players. In a very short period of time I learned that every player in the game, and every player who showed up to play over the next few weeks, was far better than I.
Now, I am not a dumb person. After winning once and losing about 23 times, it occurred to me that I might not be as good a player as the others in the game. But I am also not a person to give up. Just as I had become a Life Master at Bridge many years before, I realized that in order to be really skilled at any game, I must take it seriously and I must study.
I went out and bought a couple of books on Backgammon, and through the internet, I got the names of some top teachers. I have spent the last 25 years reading and studying this game. I am happy to say that my chouette and tournament play has improved, and my win/loss record is now a little better than 23 to 1.
What I learned, the "hard way," I will be happy to share with you now. For the first 20 years I played Backgammon I concentrated on the "look" of the game. I knew a 6 point prime looked good; I knew holding points in your opponent's board only looked good if you had good timing so that you could play a successful back game. I would drop a cube if it looked really bad, and I would give the cube if it looked really good.
I actually got to be a fairly decent player relying on my "looks"; Plenty good in fact, to beat most of my friends and family most of the time. But when I got out into the "real world" of backgammon, and started playing others for money, and started competing in tournaments, it was obvious that my game was pretty lousy in comparison to the truly good players.
By reading books and articles and talking to top players and taking lessons from some of the best players in the world, the most important thing I learned was that in order to become a really good player, it is not about looks at all - it's math.
This is the big secret to success in backgammon. IT'S ALL MATH! You can be a decent player relying on looks and feel, but you cannot become a really great, or even really good player, without doing the math.
For every single checker play there is usually one best play (one in a while there are two or three that tie, but not often), and that play is better because your odds of winning the game or match are higher with that play than with any other. Every time you have a cube decision, there is one decision that is best because of the odds. And odds is percentages... it's all numbers... all math.
The winner of every game of backgammon is either the player who gets his last checker off first, or the player who gets his opponent to drop the cube because his odds of getting that checker off first are too high. Every checker play and cube decision along the way is done with this outcome in mind. And the only way to know who has the best odds of removing that last checker first, and what those odds are, is by doing the math.
What all the books and teachers taught me, more than anything else, is what math I needed to do and how to do it. And that is what any advanced backgammon lessons are all about.
When I first came to this realization, I have to admit, it kind of took the fun out of the game for me. I am not great mathematician. I don't have a lot of fun calculating odds and percentages in my head--on top of all the other aggravation of playing backgammon, they don't even allow you to use a pencil and paper to do the math, much less a calculator! I even said to myself that if you have to be a great mathematician to be a great backgammon player, why bother with backgammon? If I were that good at math I'd be better off studying quantum mechanics and coming up with the solution to the string theory.
Turns out, quantum mechanics is actually a little harder than backgammon, and backgammon, to me, is a lot more fun. Yes, making the right plays and decisions is all about math, but there is also luck, and fun, and the "human element." Once you understand the basic math, backgammon, like poker and other player vs. player games, also includes reading your opponent, having the guts to make the tough plays and decisions, and dealing with the luck factor. (Even dealing with the luck factor is all about the odds.)
I also found out that the math is really not that terribly difficult once you do a few things to make it easier:
So, do you want to not waste the 20 years I wasted playing backgammon at a mediocre level? Learn the math. And the way to do that is a three-fold process:
"How do I know, for sure, that this is right?" you might ask. The proof is in the results. Not only can I show better results for my own tournament play, I can sit down and get my game rated by Snowie or Jellyfish (computer programs) and they will show that my skill level is higher. And of course, I am doing better in chouettes now as well. But the best proof is to look at the major tournament results. With few exceptions, the winners of major tournaments, and the players who are the highest ranked in the world, can all tell you that they use math, or reference positions that include the math, in EVERY PLAY THEY MAKE. It is no accident that ALL the players who win the most approach the game mathematically.